Search
There are 5 results.
Tag
Tag
All (40)
Active Learning (1)
Activities (2)
Assessments (2)
Canvas (4)
Case Studies (1)
Collaboration (2)
Content Creation (5)
Course Maintenance (4)
Course Materials (3)
Discussions (1)
Diversity (1)
Equity (1)
Faculty Presence (1)
Feedback (2)
Grading (3)
Hyperlinks (1)
Images (3)
Inclusion (1)
Infographics (1)
Learning Objectives (1)
Multimodality (1)
Page Design (1)
Peer Review (1)
PowerPoint (2)
Presentations (1)
Representation (1)
Revising (2)
Rubrics (3)
Screen Readers (1)
Social Media (1)
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (1)
Video (9)
Visual Accessibility (2)
Visual Design (1)
Workload (1)
Enhancing Quantitative Courses With Varied Learning Approaches
Employing a variety of modes of instruction and assessment, as recommended by Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles, can enhance the learning experience for students in quantitative courses. Diverse elements such as visual aids, interactive features, and real-world applications can complement, extend, or replace traditional lectures and exams. Since classes consist of students with varying learning preferences and strategies, using multiple modes of representation in a course promotes deeper understanding, engagement, and skill development. This piece details design elements that can be particularly impactful in quantitative courses.
Encouraging Effective Discussions
Online forums are valuable learning tools: they merit the time and thought it takes to create them, but they must be well-designed to be effective for instructors and students. Baker and Ahlegren (2022) note that instructors may start out with the best of intentions and a desire to achieve multiple goals, such as promoting critical thinking and fostering a community of authentic learners. However, discussion boards often become just another writing assignment, a missed opportunity to “elicit debate, inspire meaningful ideas, and fully engage . . . learner[s]” (Blakely et al., 2022, p. 3). When this happens, students can view discussions as transactional, not transformative (p. 3).