Search
There are 5 results.
Tag
Tag
All (37)
Active Learning (1)
Alt Text (2)
Animations (1)
Assessments (1)
Asynchrony (2)
Authentic Activities (1)
Belonging (1)
Canvas (1)
Case Studies (1)
Color Contrast (2)
Communication (1)
Community (1)
Content Creation (3)
Content Curation (1)
Content Delivery (1)
Copyright (1)
Course Materials (3)
Discussions (1)
Diversity (2)
Equity (2)
Feedback (1)
Formative Assessments (2)
Images (1)
Inclusion (2)
Inclusive Language (1)
Infographics (2)
Multimodality (3)
Page Design (1)
Podcasts (1)
PowerPoint (2)
Presentations (1)
Representation (1)
Rubrics (1)
Social Media (1)
Spreadsheets (1)
Summative Assessments (1)
Synchrony (2)
Third-Party Tools (1)
UDL (1)
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (1)
Video (5)
Visual Accessibility (1)
Visual Design (1)
Format
Copyright
From time to time instructors may want to include in their courses copyrighted materials like images, print content, audio recordings, or videos. The University of Minnesota Libraries define copyright as “the area of law that deals with creation, ownership, sale, and use of creative and expressive works.”
Five Ways to Combat Linguistic Bias in the Classroom
Developments such as the evolution of World Englishes (WE) and African American scholars’ use of African American Vernacular English (AAVE) have opened an important dialogue around academic writing standards, language ownership, and linguistic justice (Canagarajah, 2006; Young, 2010). Authors like Gloria Anzaldua who mix, for example, Native Indian, Spanish, and English in texts, are engaging in the literary tradition of code meshing, which has been shown to facilitate acquisition of English when used by multicultural students in the classroom, according to research (Canagarajah, 2006). By adopting inclusive practices, course designers can combat linguistic bias and promote writing achievement for all learners. This blog contains five recommendations for reducing linguistic bias in online education.
Encouraging Effective Discussions
Online forums are valuable learning tools: they merit the time and thought it takes to create them, but they must be well-designed to be effective for instructors and students. Baker and Ahlegren (2022) note that instructors may start out with the best of intentions and a desire to achieve multiple goals, such as promoting critical thinking and fostering a community of authentic learners. However, discussion boards often become just another writing assignment, a missed opportunity to “elicit debate, inspire meaningful ideas, and fully engage . . . learner[s]” (Blakely et al., 2022, p. 3). When this happens, students can view discussions as transactional, not transformative (p. 3).