Search
There are 4 results.
Tag
Tag
All (39)
Active Learning (1)
Alt Text (2)
Analytics (2)
Backwards Design (1)
Belonging (2)
Canvas (4)
Color Contrast (2)
Communication (3)
Community (1)
Content Creation (4)
Course Maintenance (4)
Course Materials (5)
Course Preparation (3)
Diversity (3)
Equity (2)
Faculty Presence (1)
Faculty Support (1)
Generative AI (1)
Grading (1)
Hyperlinks (1)
Images (1)
Inclusion (5)
Page Design (1)
PowerPoint (1)
Representation (1)
Revising (2)
Rubrics (2)
Screen Readers (1)
Synchrony (1)
Third-Party Tools (1)
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (1)
Video (1)
Visual Accessibility (2)
Artificial Intelligence and Online Learning
Higher education institutions are racing to keep pace with the disruption caused by artificial intelligence (AI) tools. A 2023 QuickPoll survey by Educause found that 83% of higher education stakeholders believe generative AI will "profoundly change" the sector over the next three to five years. Additionally, 65% agreed that "the use of generative AI in higher ed has more benefits than drawbacks" (McCormack, 2023, Table 1). While institutions are exploring AI's potential in areas such as admissions, enrollment, administrative duties, scheduling, and institutional data research, this piece focuses on the overarching risks and rewards AI presents in teaching and learning.
No Sweat Alt Text
What is “alt text”? Alt text is descriptive text linked to an image, graph, or other visual content that allows users to understand the visual without viewing it. Any image online should contain alt text, but guidelines differ depending on whether the image is simply decorative or related to other content on the page.
Rubrics as a Tool to Support Equity and Inclusion
While student populations have become increasingly diverse, many groups, including first-generation, non-native English speakers, and individuals with disabilities, still face barriers and bias that can derail their success in college (Super et al., 2020). Traditional grading practices—including penalties for late work, writing in dialects other than standard English, and even plagiarism— are prone to bias and only perpetuate disparities, the research says (Feldman, 2019; Savini, 2021).